ScienceOpen strives to protect the privacy of patients and research participants by ensuring that their personal information and data are handled responsibly and with due regard for their rights and autonomy. The ScienceOpen Patient Privacy and Informed Consent Policy seeks to ensure that participants have provided informed consent for their data to be used in research publications.

1. Definition of terms

• Patient: A person receiving medical treatment or participating in a clinical trial.
• Research participant: A person participating in a research study, including but not limited to clinical trials, surveys, and interviews.
• Personal information: Any data that can be used to identify an individual, including but not limited to name, address, email, telephone number, medical record number, and social security number.

2. Informed consent: Authors submitting research articles must confirm that the research was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical standards and that informed consent was obtained from all research participants. This includes the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information and data. The consent form must clearly state the purpose of the research, how the data will be used, and any risks or benefits associated with participation.
3. Protection of personal information: Authors must take reasonable steps to protect the personal information and data of research participants. This includes implementing appropriate security measures to prevent unauthorized access, disclosure, or use of personal information.
4. De-identification of personal information: Authors must de-identify personal information and data to the extent possible before publishing research articles. Any personal information that cannot be de-identified must be removed from the article or masked in a way that ensures the privacy of the research participant.
5. Retention and disposal of personal information: Authors must retain personal information and data only for as long as it is necessary to fulfill the purposes for which it was collected. At the end of the retention period, authors must dispose of personal information and data securely.
6. Disclosure of personal information: Authors must disclose the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information and data in a transparent manner. Any third-party access or disclosure of personal information and data must be disclosed to the research participants and authorized by them.
7. Compliance with laws and regulations: Authors must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including but not limited to data protection laws, privacy laws, and regulations related to the conduct of research involving human subjects.

Non-compliance with this policy may result in the rejection of the manuscript, retraction of a preprint or article publication, and other disciplinary action as deemed appropriate by the publisher. This policy will be reviewed periodically and updated as necessary to reflect changes in laws and regulations or best practices.

1. Retractions

a) Circumstances under which ScienceOpen will retract an article

ScienceOpen is committed to playing its part in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record, therefore on occasion, it is necessary to retract articles. Articles may be retracted if:

• There is major scientific error which would invalidate the conclusions of the article, for example where there is clear evidence that findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).
• Where the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication).
• Where there are ethical issues such as plagiarism (appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit including those obtained through confidential review of others’ manuscripts) or inappropriate authorship (e.g., “guest” authorship; see COPE discussion document ‘What constitutes authorship?’).
• Where unethical research has been reported.

b) ScienceOpen’s retraction process

In order to ensure that retractions are handled according to industry best practice, and in accordance with COPE guidelines, ScienceOpen adopts the following retraction process:

• An article requiring potential retraction is brought to the attention of the journal editor. The retraction request can be brought by the authors, co-authors, related institutions or third-parties.
• The journal editor should follow the step-by-step guidelines according to the COPE flowcharts (including evaluating a response from the author of the article in question).
• Before any action is taken, the editor’s findings should be sent to ScienceOpen for review. The purpose of this step is to ensure a consistent approach in accordance with industry best practice.
• The final decision as to whether to retract is then communicated to the author and, if necessary, any other relevant bodies, such as the author’s institution on occasion.
• The retraction statement is then posted online with its own DOI and linked to the retracted paper. The title of the article is changed to add the term “RETRACTED:” as a prefix to the title. A cover page with the information RETRACTED is added to the pdf file.

c) Complaints procedure

To challenge to a retraction or a related issue, ScienceOpen’s procedure is as follows:

• The complaint may be submitted via the journal editor or directly to ScienceOpen at info@scienceopen.com.
• An independent investigation is then carried out by at least two representatives from ScienceOpen and/or the Editorial Board of the journal (the “investigatory team”).
• The investigation involves reviewing all correspondence relating to the case in question and, if necessary, obtaining further written responses to queries from the parties involved.
• The purpose of the investigation is to establish that correct procedures have been followed, that decisions have been reached based on academic criteria, that personal prejudice or bias of some kind has not influenced the outcome, and that appropriate sanctions have been applied where relevant.
• The investigatory team will then submit its findings to ScienceOpen for further review before any onward communications to the appropriate parties.
• Complainants may choose to take their complaint to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

d) Process for issuing a retraction statement

Where the decision is taken to retract and the article to be retracted is the Version of Record (i.e. it has been published as Preprint or within an issue of a journal), ScienceOpen recommends issuing a retraction statement which should be published separately but should be linked to the article being retracted. A “retracted” coverpage will be added to the article pdf; however the article as first published should be retained online in order to maintain the scientific record. Issuing a retraction statement will mean the following:

• The retraction will be listed in the contents page and the title of the original article will be included in its heading;
• The text of the retraction should explain why the article is being retracted; and
• The statement of retraction and the original article must be clearly linked in the electronic database so that the retraction will always be apparent to anyone who comes across the original article.

e) Circumstances under which an article may be deleted

It is ScienceOpen’s policy to strongly discourage withdrawal of the Version of Record in line with the international guidelines on retractions and preservation of the objective record of science. Therefore deletion of the Version of Record is rare and ScienceOpen will only consider it in the following limited circumstances:

• Where there has been a violation of the privacy of a research subject;
• Where there are errors to which a member of the general public might be exposed and if followed or adopted, would pose a significant risk to health; or
• Where a clearly defamatory comment has been made about others in the relevant field or about their work.
• Where an Accepted Article (which represents an early version of an article) is to be retracted, because for example it contains errors, has been accidentally submitted twice or infringes a professional ethical code of some type, it may be deleted. This is because, whilst an Accepted Article will have been allocated a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), it does not constitute the Version of Record as it will not yet have been formally published and does not yet carry complete bibliographic information.

Even in the above circumstances, bibliographic information about the deleted article should be retained for the scientific record, and an explanation given, however brief, about the circumstances of its removal.

2. Withdrawals

a) Circumstances under which an article may be withdrawn

It is ScienceOpen’s policy to strongly discourage withdrawal of the Version of Record, whether a preprint or published article, because it has already been assigned a permanent DOI which is immediately shared with many thrid party sercives. Therefore, withdrawal or deletion of the Version of Record is rare, and ScienceOpen will only consider it in limited circumstances, such as the following:

• Where there has been a violation of the privacy of a research subject;
• Where there are errors to which a member of the general public might be exposed and if followed or adopted, would pose a significant risk to health; or
• Where a clearly defamatory comment has been made about others in the relevant field or about their work.
• There are legal issues around the authorship of the work or plagiarism.

b) Process for issuing a Withdrawal

A withdrawal is usually initiated before the article is published (before or after peer review, during peer review or just before publication). This situation can be more complicated in the case of public preprints. In order for preprints to be considered permanent research objects that are able to be cited and used to demonstrate productivity for grants or job applications, readers must be able to cite them without fear that they will spontaneously become unavailable. Therefore, removal of preprint files is typically reserved for cases where there are significant ethical or legal concerns with the original paper. Where the decision is taken to withdraw and the preprint to be retracted is the Version of Record and has been issued a DOI, ScienceOpen recommends publishing a new version by posting a new version of the paper that is effectively a withdrawal notice published separately but is linked to the article being retracted.

3. Expressions of Concern

Journal editors may consider issuing an Expression of Concern if they have well-founded concerns and feel that readers should be made aware of potentially misleading information contained in an article. However, Expressions of Concern should only be issued if an investigation into the problems relating to the article has proved inconclusive, and if there remain strong indicators that the concerns are valid. See COPE case 17-02 Data manipulation and institute’s internal review.

On very rare occasions, an Expression of Concern may be issued while an investigation is underway but a judgement will not be available for a considerable time. However, in such cases there must be well-founded grounds to suggest that the concerns are valid.

In all cases, editors should be aware that an Expression of Concern carries the same risks to a researcher’s reputation as a retraction, and it is often preferable to wait to publish a retraction until a definitive judgement has been achieved by an independent investigation. See COPE case 15-10 Handling self-admissions of fraud.

RExPO_Abstract template

Copyright for all third party content lies with original copyright-holder. All content published by ScienceOpen is under the Creative Commons license CC-BY 4.0.

ScienceOpen and the ScienceOpen logo are registered trademarks ® of ScienceOpen GmbH or ScienceOpen, Inc., and may be not used without written permission. Website design: © ScienceOpen 2022.

MARC XML for Exporting your Metadata

Stay tuned for MARC XMLs to be available for metadata export later this year!

Upload Content via easy ID lookup/ Export Crossref XMLs

Apart from files upload, you can also query metadata for your publication by making a simple query based on IDs. Currently supported in the system are Crossref and DataCite DOIs.

How To upload content via IDs:

Open the dropdown menu of your →My BookMetaHub and go to your →Dashboard.

On the Dashboard, you can chose to:

• Add metadata by DOI

You can easily add basic metadata for your books and chapters by submitting a list of Crossref and Datacite DOIs. Simply paste a list of DOIs into the request box or upload an excel sheet to query all metadata for your DOIs.

• As a last step for both please select your →Publisher Workspace for all requested records to be imported to.

After your request is processed, we will send you a notification by e-mail.

Enhanced Book and chapter records are also available in Crossref-compatible XML format to be exported and send to other third-party content aggregators. Just go to the Record page to download the CR XMLs.

Import / Export Content via ONIX Files

Apart from querying metadata via DOI look-up, you can also import metadata for your publication based on ONIX files. Currently supported in the system is ONIX 3.0.

HowTo upload content via ONIX:

Open the dropdown menu of your →My BookMetaHub and go to your →Dashboard.

On the Dashboard, you can chose to:

• Upload ONIX XML metadata

You can upload ONIX XMLs via the Dashboard. Currently supported ONIX formats are 3.0, and ONIX 2.1 in testing. Please note that readout for ONIX 3.0 might lead to better results for your metadata. This is due to the fact that the later format is more standardized, which in return leads to a higher chance for a richer set of imported data.

• As a last step for both please select your →Publisher Workspace for all requested records to be imported to.

After your request is processed, we will send you a notification by e-mail.

Stay tuned for ONIX export formats to become available later this year!

Import / Export Content via BITS Files

After successful creation or enhancement of your book and chapter metadata, you can freely download all content to share with other third-party content aggregators

HowTo export content via BITS:

On all record pages on the BookMetaHub you will find a →Download button. Just click the button, and select your preferred →export format. Supported currently in the system are BITS XMLs and Crossref XML

Stay tuned for BITS import formats to become available later this year!

ScienceOpen is a freely accessible, interactive research communication platform with the technological infrastructure to support multi-dimensional search and discovery, community curation and researcher networking. We offer free tools for researchers to communicate, evaluate and promote their research within the broad interdisciplinary context of over 70 million articles and records.

Institutes may be interested in promoting their publications with an institutional collection or network of collections. Faculties and research groups can also create their own networks of collections that can be flexibly used for educational purposes such as a reading list for new members, journal clubs for discussion, showcases for faculty output, overlay journals combined with preprints, training ground for open peer review and more. Beyond our free products for researchers, the ScienceOpen technology can be customized to meet current or future needs of your institute. Some ideas:

• Interactive bibliography – search and sort by citations, altmetrics, preprint, open access and more
• Promotional tools to help your researchers increase their online visibility
• Lay summaries to increase outreach to general public
• Repository software solutions
• Preprint server
• Publishing support for institutional open access journals

We are happy to explore customized technology solutions for your institution with you. For further information and individual pricing contact Alexander Grossmann or Stephanie Dawson.

Open access journals are changing the rules of the game in more ways than just making research freely accessible. Increasingly, funding bodies are starting their own open access publishing outlets to provide low-cost, high quality journal alternatives for the research they fund. The rise of preprints in the last years has also changed the ways in which researchers are communicating their results and founders are stepping up by acknowledging preprints in grant applications.

ScienceOpen, as a freely accessible, interactive research communication platform with open access at its core. We can offer full professional open access publishing services that connect our partners to major infrastructures such as ORCID and Crossref. We have all the components to quickly customize a system with preprints, open peer review, open access publishing, alternative metrics, and citation tracking. The ScienceOpen technology can be customized to help you create the publishing platform of the future.

• With full-text XML and pdf hosting on ScienceOpen your DOI lands in the rich contextual environment of the ScienceOpen
• Integration with ORCID, Crossref
• Collection landing page to showcase your journal
• Preprint aggregation and creation of preprint servers
• Context environment of over 60 million records driving search and discovery
• Dynamic search and filtering of all content at journal, publisher, author and collection level
• Article- and journal level usage statistics on the fly, plus quarterly usage reports
• Publisher and journal collections promoted with a banner on all relevant content in over 60 million article records
• Author-promotion tools for users to add lay summaries and share and track their work
• Community-run, researcher-led topical collections further promote usage
• Commenting and recommendation functionalities
• Post-publication peer review functionalities to further engage community

We can provide customized technology, hosting and publishing solutions for funders. For further information and individual pricing contact Alexander Grossmann or Stephanie Dawson.